Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$315
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 145
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,106
99% 836 Pts
64-Core 2,135
132% 2,135 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 120
Parallax 124
108% 125 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.7
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,792
Write 1,824
Mixed 1,682
395% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 79.9
265% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 852
640% 862 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 305%
Tdas TerraMaster 960GB
485GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 137 141 145 144 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 261
Write 112
Mixed 227
SusWrite 134
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 21.5
77% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 47.3
60% 108 MB/s
Tdas TerraMaster 1TB
813GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 139 139 142 143 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.5% Below average
Read 371
Write 326
Mixed 279
SusWrite 133
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.5
35% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 0.6
19% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 57%
Tdas TerraMaster 500GB
365GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 138 141 144 146 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 53%
Tdas TerraMaster 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 187 190 185 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 239
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 189
131% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.9
208% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 40.2
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 111%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback