Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 169% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '23 at 00:03
Run Duration	315 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$355 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Memory 79.2 1-Core 143 2-Core 280 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 531 8-Core 908 87% 719 Pts	64-Core 3,039 188% 3,039 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 202 Parallax 192 176% 203 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 151 Splatting 134 127% 159 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$550 3,198 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2479 Write 1,933 Mixed 1,510 437% 1,974 MB/s	4K Read 59.2 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 47.8 203% 68.2 MB/s	DQ Read 656 DQ Write 94.5 DQ Mixed 148 166% 299 MB/s
Poor: 201% Great: 435%
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-0E005 960GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 75GB free Firmware: GXM1003Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 330 377 392 333 403 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 456 Write 383 Mixed 400 SusWrite 364 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 9.2 74% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 86.5 DQ Mixed 175 124% 162 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 119%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 274GB free Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 752 691 611 149 348 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 751 Write 180 Mixed 861 SusWrite 471 127% 566 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 30.8 100% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 410 DQ Write 63.9 DQ Mixed 33.6 77% 169 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 282%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 659GB free Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 601 807 854 1012 775 939 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 916 Write 356 Mixed 890 SusWrite 832 168% 748 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 33.6 119% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 771 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 121 164% 320 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 282%
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-0E005 960GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 894GB free Firmware: GXM1003Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 316 327 395 289 336 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 472 Write 399 Mixed 383 SusWrite 331 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 28.3 94% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 72.8 DQ Mixed 138 105% 145 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 119%
SSK 2TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 649GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 257 265 320 233 179 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 327 Write 329 Mixed 311 SusWrite 253 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 25 81% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 72.3 DQ Mixed 46.5 62% 117 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 95%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 879GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 349GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 148 162 211 143 173 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53% Above average	Read 450 Write 288 Mixed 396 SusWrite 163 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 10.7 64% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 40.4 DQ Mixed 120 94% 137 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 59%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1TB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 100 101 126 91 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.6% Average	Read 396 Write 179 Mixed 410 SusWrite 105 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 10.8 60% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 46.9 DQ Mixed 122 98% 143 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZR 2x31.5GB 2,368 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 56.5 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 33.9 117% 41.1 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 31.7 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	400x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	386x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $164Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	336x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	271x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,000Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	153x
RTX 3070Nvidia $497Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	146x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	172x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	115x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	71x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	122x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	68x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353