Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '23 at 19:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 152
2-Core 297
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 494
62% 472 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 75.1
0% 44.9 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 44.6
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed K7-256G-CD 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.5 5.1 5.4 92 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 446
Write 198
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 19.1
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
73GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 57.2
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 58.6
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAD3200U1816 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 46.8
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 33.9
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback