Asus M11AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M11AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M11AD
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 21:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 165
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 284
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 52.2
Reflection 58
Parallax 73.9
42% 61.4 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 42.8
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed K7-256G-CD 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 335 325 109 16 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 473
Write 344
Mixed 362
SusWrite 199
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 23.8
120% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 37.3
76% 147 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GLK64V3H 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M11AD Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M11AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback