MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$440
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 237
2-Core 470
134% 263 Pts
4-Core 940
8-Core 1,849
165% 1,395 Pts
64-Core 4,057
251% 4,057 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 129%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,764
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
116% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 142
Splatting 143
117% 143 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 113%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 422 408 393 350 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 2,191
Write 539
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 459
246% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 48
172% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 1,583
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 425
428% 733 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 208%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
159GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 358 357 360 367 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 348
Write 342
Mixed 331
SusWrite 360
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 34.7
113% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 210
157% 212 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
88GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2236
Write 2108
Mixed 1960
469% 2,101 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 98.6
332% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,687
DQ Write 1,516
DQ Mixed 1,602
1,201% 1,602 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID c753
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.9 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.1
9% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5600C40 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
187% Outstanding
MC Read 76.1
MC Write 73.6
MC Mixed 70.5
210% 73.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 35.9
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 187%
Great: 192%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 5,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback