Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3950 23 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Memory 20.4 1-Core 36.4 2-Core 72.2 23% 43 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 130 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	1.33% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 3 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.33% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GMSA230S 64GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427GN1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 72 73 73 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.1% Average	Read 266 Write 73.3 Mixed 111 SusWrite 72.1 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 25.5 93% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 80.3 DQ Write 72.4 DQ Mixed 66.9 53% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H-I 1x4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 318 13% 318 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325