Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 97.9
38% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 192
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 2
2% 2.75 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.65
3% 3.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Storfly VSFB25XI060G-555 60GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0202-000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 379 400 372 391 405 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.2% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 380
Mixed 366
SusWrite 382
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 34.1
114% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 254
198% 274 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H-I 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback