Asrock Z690 Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Extreme  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230213
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 16:12
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 200
2-Core 350
112% 211 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,193
107% 904 Pts
64-Core 1,904
118% 1,904 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
ASRock(1849 4680) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1002
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 11.3
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKKW512G8 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 006C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 532 534 537 541 542 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,402
Write 1,480
Mixed 1,279
SusWrite 595
319% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 91.9
299% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 198
250% 458 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 252%
Great: 282%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
455GB free
Firmware: 003C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1753 738 150 150 251 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,629
Write 1,784
Mixed 1,467
SusWrite 533
356% 1,603 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 73
238% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 176
255% 488 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 241%
Great: 387%
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-256M8PeGN 256GB
119GB free
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 880 878 799 781 783 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,404
Write 922
Mixed 706
SusWrite 833
215% 966 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 50.6
169% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 599
DQ Mixed 550
458% 666 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 192%
Great: 192%
Intel Raid 10 Volume 2TB
615GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 290 290 293 297 294 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 283
Write 251
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 291
161% 223 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
253% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 164%
Great: 175%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
845GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 165 163 161 170 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 163
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
692GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 177 182 180 184 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 98
Write 134
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 178
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 30.7
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 30.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z690 Extreme Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback