Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 298%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 394%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BWA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 231
2-Core 459
132% 258 Pts
4-Core 914
8-Core 1,743
158% 1,328 Pts
64-Core 4,181
259% 4,181 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 128%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
Asus(1043 88A7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
243% Outstanding
Lighting 351
Reflection 332
Parallax 354
286% 346 fps
MRender 494
Gravity 300
Splatting 216
261% 337 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 243%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Rogueware M.2 PCIe NX200M 1TB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 223 226 222 230 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 359
Mixed 249
SusWrite 225
118% 546 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 18.1
158% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 217
236% 415 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD416LH1C 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 34.8
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 32.8
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback