Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 02:57
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$130
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 73.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 271
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 810
82% 665 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4077) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 168
Parallax 161
150% 171 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 131
Splatting 114
114% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
735GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 557 607 732 733 731 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1242
Write 719
Mixed 629
SusWrite 646
180% 809 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 29.6
96% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 80.9
DQ Mixed 106
99% 159 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 127%
Great: 297%
Ssd-m2-blaze GD-704 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: SN08193
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3171 3535 3670 3672 1825 1513 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 4,156
Write 4,167
Mixed 3,106
SusWrite 2,898
805% 3,582 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 80.4
264% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 929
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 776
584% 787 MB/s
Poor: 320%
This bench: 461%
Great: 565%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 159 164 177 173 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 168
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 169
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.15278S.002 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.1
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 27.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback