Today's hottest deals

MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 18:53
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$265
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 201
2-Core 398
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,402
133% 1,103 Pts
64-Core 2,685
166% 2,685 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 122
Parallax 125
110% 127 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 105
Splatting 92.2
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
156GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 444 419 440 441 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 482
Mixed 467
SusWrite 441
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 49.3
166% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 339
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1652 1383 1040 950 992 953 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,677
Write 2,470
Mixed 1,910
SusWrite 1,162
460% 2,055 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 105
342% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,641
DQ Write 1,416
DQ Mixed 1,512
1,138% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 353%
Great: 410%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
97GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 77 125 53 62 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 628
Write 328
Mixed 416
SusWrite 96.5
81% 367 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 52.5
207% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 177
152% 217 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: VAC8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 208 208 192 208 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 481
Write 209
Mixed 240
SusWrite 205
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 31.6
114% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 160
143% 218 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
266GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 130 146 152 109 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 131
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 168 162 162 171 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 136
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 159
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
219GB free
Firmware: AM0P3M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61% Good
Read 105
Write 112
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 107
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 Kingston KHX2400C15/8G Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4(MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 11,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 231%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4 - $82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback