Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 520%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics369% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 23:55
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$479
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 190
2-Core 382
117% 221 Pts
4-Core 755
8-Core 1,494
133% 1,125 Pts
64-Core 3,451
214% 3,451 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
369% Outstanding
Lighting 592
Reflection 536
Parallax 697
483% 608 fps
MRender 495
Gravity 538
Splatting 280
342% 438 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 369%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1960 2011 2085 2176 2127 2146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 1510
Write 2,122
Mixed 1,752
SusWrite 2,084
424% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 74.5
264% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,533
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 1,329
997% 1,337 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 328%
Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
814GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2101 2186 2241 2222 2277 1246 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 2,288
Write 2,091
Mixed 2,188
SusWrite 2,046
485% 2,153 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 82.9
272% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,659
DQ Write 1312
DQ Mixed 1,467
1,103% 1,479 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 367%
Great: 410%
Seagate ST4000NM0035-1V4107 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: TN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 199 201 201 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 183
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 199
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
262% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6400 C32 2x32GB-$233
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
172% Outstanding
MC Read 75.8
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 58.2
179% 62.6 GB/s
SC Read 57.8
SC Write 57.8
SC Mixed 52.9
160% 56.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 172%
Great: 229%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,096
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback