Lenovo 20RDCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20RDCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20RDCTO1WW
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 09:03
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 117
50% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 246
28% 218 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 507A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 4.1
3% 10.1 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 266 198 153 150 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,709
Write 363
Mixed 425
SusWrite 201
146% 675 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 37.6
143% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 332
252% 340 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 140%
Great: 279%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
219GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 317 346 326 275 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 396
Write 276
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 321
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 10.2
49% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 16.4
14% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51%
Great: 102%
Jmicron Tech 2TB
471GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 116 115 117 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 66.5
Write 61
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 115
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 108%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.3 0.6 0.7 3.1 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 156
Write 155
Mixed 169
SusWrite 1.4
156% 120 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.3
263% 7.57 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 141%
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.7 3 1.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 183
Write 180
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 1.4
125% 105 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.4
249% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 93%
External USB3.0 DISK02 160GB
101GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 35 45 39 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.4% Poor
Read 49.2
Write 50.3
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 44.2
58% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK03 1TB
570GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 3.6 1.8 2.3 8.6 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 170
Write 134
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 3.5
120% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 69%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
7TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 35 45 39 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 179
Write 183
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 43.9
137% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.4
224% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20RDCTO1WW Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20RDCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback