Today's hottest deals

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 20:58
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,053
100% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,421
88% 1,421 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 176
Parallax 365
143% 239 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 134
Splatting 208
172% 213 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 279 278 228 251 264 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,391
Write 1,433
Mixed 1,291
SusWrite 290
299% 1,351 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 83.9
285% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,071
DQ Mixed 1,003
761% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 247%
Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
227GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 209 257 256 258 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 465
Mixed 444
SusWrite 244
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.7
181% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 276
232% 337 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 249 255 253 253 253 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 465
Write 325
Mixed 89
SusWrite 253
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 1
16% 7.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 3
3% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 38%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
491GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 532 531 531 533 530 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
External USB3.0 DISK02 1TB
787GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 182 177 178 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 166
Write 154
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 182
195% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK03 8TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 185 183 186 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 208
Write 180
Mixed 174
SusWrite 183
250% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
291% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB
927GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 186 185 187 187 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 195
Write 181
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 185
217% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79% Very good
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 28.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 28
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback