Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 14:19
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 167
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 494
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
Device(107D 2793) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 139
Parallax 106
105% 124 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 82.6
Splatting 80.4
78% 98.7 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Miwhole CT300 512GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08193
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1089 1102 1096 674 430 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,248
Write 1141
Mixed 1,121
SusWrite 794
242% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 64
213% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 782
569% 742 MB/s
Poor: 197%
This bench: 197%
Great: 444%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
94GB free
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 122 67 124 117 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 236
Write 178
Mixed 182
SusWrite 124
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 17.3
62% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 16.5
32% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
891GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 192 190 195 192 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 76.7
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 190
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GB
1 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback