HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 02:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 516
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microfrom 512GB SATA3 SSD 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 409 405 420 433 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 456
Write 409
Mixed 392
SusWrite 417
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 24.5
105% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 41.3
88% 176 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST3000NM0005-1V410N 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: TN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 196 194 196 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 158
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 196
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
253% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 12
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback