Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault HCAR6000-MI2
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 16:06
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 178
2-Core 341
105% 199 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1249
115% 962 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 48
Parallax 69.2
34% 53.1 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 25.8
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HYV256X3(HXY) 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1905 1213 376 255 196 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,162
Write 2,014
Mixed 1,438
SusWrite 686
300% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 96.2
352% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,542
DQ Write 1,326
DQ Mixed 1,313
1,017% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 261%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 38.5
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 31.1
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 117%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback