Intel X99-P3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P3  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '24 at 19:27
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 146
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 575
50% 426 Pts
64-Core 1179
73% 1179 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 106
Parallax 107
91% 108 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 101
Splatting 93.6
87% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HYV256X3(HXY) 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1797 455 182 81 84 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 934
Write 1,881
Mixed 1,231
SusWrite 451
255% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 46.8
149% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 349
252% 329 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 126%
Great: 261%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
169GB free
Firmware: SBFKQ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 73 158 158 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.4% Above average
Read 234
Write 235
Mixed 219
SusWrite 93.9
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 29.1
100% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 151
123% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
59GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 140 124 116 118 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 204
Write 102
Mixed 123
SusWrite 137
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 17.3
66% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 57.9
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 47.9
39% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 169 154 151 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 90.5
Write 77
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 163
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 6
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 58 120 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7089 LC32G5xT
Typical X99-P3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback