Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 27.6 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 108 36% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 221 27% 208 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.39% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 3 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biwin CSE80A1A100-512 512GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0411A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 252 277 259 250 215 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 362 Write 304 Mixed 306 SusWrite 254 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 15.3 59% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 41.3 66% 125 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x12GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 7.8 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	48	60	15.6"	1536 864	BOE0747

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	13x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	13x

SSD
BGM.2 NGFF SSD 512GBMGBench 61%, 16 samples	6x
CSE80A1A100-512G 512GBBiwinBench 68%, 21 samples	4x
CSE80A1A100-512 512GBBiwinBench 68%, 5 samples	3x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x12GBHynixBench 35%, 24 samples	8x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GBSamsungBench 37%, 25 samples	2x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GBUnknownBench 46%, 2 samples	2x