Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 23:59
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 212
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 706
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 168
Parallax 158
143% 167 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 127
Splatting 111
110% 138 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT2000T70 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1899 1978 1659 1104 1519 1845 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,834
Write 2,184
Mixed 1,894
SusWrite 1,667
428% 1,895 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 59.8
193% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 651
DQ Write 512
DQ Mixed 553
422% 572 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 261%
Great: 843%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
37GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 137 177 176 178 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 478
Write 428
Mixed 346
SusWrite 216
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 29.8
90% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 206
190% 291 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
4GB free
Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,192
Write 1,089
Mixed 501
205% 928 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 45.8
149% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 569
432% 587 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
224GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 103 104 103 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 59
SusWrite 105
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 70%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
387GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 78 90 83 85 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 62.5
Write 76
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 83.4
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 16 17 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 111
Write 66.7
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 18.9
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
145% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 99%
PHILIPS 64GB
27GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 21.2
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP32G4DFRA32A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 21.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 14 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback