Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-RS9
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 02:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 94.2
54% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 251
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Taifast NGFF 512GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 333 37 76 76 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
Read 407
Write 344
Mixed 331
SusWrite 152
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 21.4
84% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 41.3
75% 144 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 0" 1280 720
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback