Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 422%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 548%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics383% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive650% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 02:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$546
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 203
2-Core 405
119% 229 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,539
139% 1,172 Pts
64-Core 3,618
224% 3,618 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,735
Asus(1043 88E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
383% Outstanding
Lighting 614
Reflection 565
Parallax 707
500% 629 fps
MRender 516
Gravity 561
Splatting 301
360% 459 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 383%
Great: 402%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 4TB-$350
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5592 5359 5414 4313 1506 1757 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
650% Outstanding
Read 6,289
Write 6,698
Mixed 3,498
SusWrite 3,990
1,148% 5,119 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 90.3
293% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,789
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,544
1,120% 1,469 MB/s
Poor: 415%
This bench: 650%
Great: 994%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M2B6000C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
240% Outstanding
MC Read 137
MC Write 65
MC Mixed 74.3
263% 92.1 GB/s
SC Read 48.4
SC Write 75.3
SC Mixed 58.4
173% 60.7 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 240%
Great: 240%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback