MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics232% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive415% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory120.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 04:05
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$349
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 900
88% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,410
87% 1,410 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
AMD(1002 1002) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
232% Outstanding
Lighting 299
Reflection 428
Parallax 584
244% 437 fps
MRender 426
Gravity 247
Splatting 427
305% 367 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 232%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 4TB-$423
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3325 3608 3591 2064 2169 2157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 3708
Write 3,158
Mixed 2,701
SusWrite 2,819
695% 3,097 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 59.9
203% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 827
582% 746 MB/s
Poor: 415%
This bench: 415%
Great: 994%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 180 189 189 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 131
Write 182
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 185
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 167 166 167 173 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 47.4
Write 116
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 167
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
184% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 36.9
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 39.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7232 Odyssey G70B
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback