Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 21:00
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 975-$550
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 56
2-Core 139
53% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 262
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 156 181 175 180 173 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 167
Write 150
Mixed 127
SusWrite 171
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 10.3
41% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 32.3
29% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 129%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 1009
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 11 8.6 13 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 2
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 10.7
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 32 0" 1280 720
Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback