Acer Aspire 4820TG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 4820TG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZQ1B
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '16 at 22:58
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 129
52% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 169
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
Acer(1025 0359) 512MB
Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.713.3.3000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 2
1% 2.16 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.26
2% 1.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 46.6
Mixed 38.4
30% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.19
48% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 43%
USB Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Read 8.43
Write 3.09
Mixed 4.43
6% 5.32 MB/s
4K Read 2.23
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
9% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4820TG Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4820TG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback