Today's hottest deals

Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 16:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 797
69% 589 Pts
64-Core 1,807
112% 1,807 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 34.8
19% 28.9 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 27.1
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1569 1588 1597 276 1032 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,970
Write 1,612
Mixed 1,286
SusWrite 1,030
330% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 59.3
194% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 410
307% 410 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 220%
Great: 290%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$42
298GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 82 81 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 83.5
Write 77.7
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 80.7
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.9" 1280 720 ENC2530 EV2450
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback