Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
Motherboard MS-16K2
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 16:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 456
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11AD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 356 319 273 332 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 429
Write 438
Mixed 358
SusWrite 316
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 32.4
107% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 336
251% 333 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 104%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
1TB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 123 124 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 139
Write 140
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 123
137% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 54%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
119GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 14 19 4.5 2.7 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 49.9
Write 36.2
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 9
39% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.2
54% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD046F
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback