Xiaomi Pad 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemXiaomi Pad 5  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft K82
Memory0.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600x2560x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 19:02
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 860
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Memory 26.1
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 68.8
25% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 98.9
8-Core 108
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC SDINFDK4-256G 254GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1270
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 643
Write 640
Mixed 572
138% 618 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 17.5
71% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 138
104% 140 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Bank 0 Not Specified 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB Row of chips LPDDR4 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 40 120 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback