Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z170M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z170M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 23:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 222
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 624
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$389
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 196
Parallax 215
172% 207 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 169
Splatting 126
154% 198 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 153%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO-1TB 1TB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0315A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 403 393 440 13 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63% Good
Read 390
Write 348
Mixed 308
SusWrite 280
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 11.6
75% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 54.2
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 22.6
67% 134 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 195 194 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 143
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 195
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 4 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Z170M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback