Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110801
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 18:21
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 77.1
38% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 102
13% 99.8 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3981) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil Z3_512GB 512GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 328 187 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 286
Write 332
Mixed 341
SusWrite 165
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 10.3
44% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 17
15% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
552GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 55.6
Write 26.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 28.9
40% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 PSD38G16002S 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 1 60 15.5" 1366 745 AUO22EC
Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback