Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 Studio XC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15 Studio XC  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 216
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 813
74% 622 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 75C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 8
6% 7.9 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SX8200PNP-512GT-S 512GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 292 360 461 160 491 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,092
Write 1,061
Mixed 534
SusWrite 413
173% 775 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 36.2
127% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 459
343% 447 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 301%
Sandisk Portable SSD 1TB
157GB free
Firmware: 0305
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 121 90 49 38 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 376
Write 199
Mixed 146
SusWrite 85.2
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 8.1
40% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 14.2
29% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 79%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
107GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 49 55 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,199
Write 914
Mixed 821
SusWrite 87
168% 755 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 46.5
161% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 222
248% 410 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 126%
Great: 242%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
251GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 372 375 372 377 377 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 383
Write 381
Mixed 281
SusWrite 375
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 24.7
80% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 98.5
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 112
82% 105 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 21.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOB78D
Typical GA-AERO 15 Studio XC Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 Studio XC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback