Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 09:39
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$137
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 272
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 830
82% 669 Pts
64-Core 1057
65% 1057 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$429
Gainward(10B0 2482) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 213
Parallax 207
194% 220 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 162
Splatting 131
142% 181 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 161%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 46 31 37 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 462
Write 35.7
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 37
31% 147 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 17.2
79% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 43.6
66% 133 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 73%
N580 240GB 240GB
109GB free
Firmware: 02T130S4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 185 63 72 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 481
Write 360
Mixed 368
SusWrite 143
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 32.6
130% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 178
164% 249 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
544GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 116 117 114 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 109
Write 126
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 116
70% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 25.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 29.2
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 27" 1280 720 HKC2712 27E1Q
Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $369WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback