Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 248% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 289% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	276% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220104
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '23 at 08:38
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355 16,922 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Memory 80.2 1-Core 140 2-Core 277 90% 166 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 1,132 100% 848 Pts	64-Core 2,199 136% 2,199 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970 22,998 User benchmarks, average bench 290% Asus(1043 889F) ≥ 4GB; Republic of gamers CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	276% Outstanding	Lighting 398 Reflection 433 Parallax 523 324% 451 fps	MRender 570 Gravity 352 Splatting 269 310% 397 fps
Poor: 263% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 305%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 500GB 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1174 1181 785 834 824 831 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD Blue SA510 2. 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 652GB free Firmware: 5303 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 334 343 209 0.5 0.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 443 Write 340 Mixed 361 SusWrite 200 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 22.1 92% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 62 71% 119 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 108%
Samsung 870 1TB 1,067 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 432GB free Firmware: SVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 355 371 230 6.5 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 398 Write 396 Mixed 382 SusWrite 217 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 40.5 126% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 134 107% 147 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 120%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 2x16GB 2,614 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 38.1 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 35.1 80% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	100	48.8"	4096 1081	AOC4930 AG493UG7R4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $228Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,171x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $355Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	876x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	873x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	613x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	531x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,000Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	492x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	485x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	314x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $165Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	217x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	291x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	160x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,363

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353