Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 261%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics252% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 18:25
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 285
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,106
99% 838 Pts
64-Core 2,167
134% 2,167 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
Asus(1043 88DD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Lighting 370
Reflection 354
Parallax 378
301% 367 fps
MRender 498
Gravity 309
Splatting 222
267% 343 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 252%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1513 1744 1791 1803 1785 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2582
Write 2,632
Mixed 1,453
SusWrite 1,688
468% 2,089 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 67.8
259% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,434
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 1,223
930% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 342%
Great: 431%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
893GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1093 1165 1166 1165 1169 1141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,405
Write 1,231
Mixed 1,211
SusWrite 1,150
281% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 80.1
273% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,509
DQ Write 1,232
DQ Mixed 1312
998% 1,351 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 272%
Great: 372%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
192GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 465 465 464 466 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 464
Mixed 334
SusWrite 462
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 41.4
150% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 158
147% 220 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
HFS128G32TNF-N2A2A 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 70060P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 121 121 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 421
Write 252
Mixed 284
SusWrite 131
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 43.3
148% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 166
143% 208 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 81%
Patriot Ignite M2 240GB
111GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 373 373 371 373 380 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30.6
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 29.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 0R 3G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 20 218 60 144 27" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix MAG27C
Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback