Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 03:00
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 434
56% 424 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 21.7
13% 17.6 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 14.1
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 2 5.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 94%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1TB
983GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 21 61 9.2 5.7 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
Read 373
Write 332
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 19.1
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 0.5
35% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
19% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 63%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 15 39 9.1 5.7 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
Read 375
Write 310
Mixed 310
SusWrite 14
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 20.6
90% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 32.5
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 63%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 21 61 9.2 5.5 7.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
Read 366
Write 320
Mixed 314
SusWrite 18.7
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 21
88% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 32.7
61% 119 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
291GB free, PID 344b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 34 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 33
Mixed 26
SusWrite 34.2
46% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G3200S 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 27.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 8 60 27.2" 1920 1080 GSM5BB7 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback