Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 01:46
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$111
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 585
56% 464 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 71
Parallax 64.6
53% 66.9 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 56.6
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 299
Mixed 332
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 34.4
138% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 24.6
77% 166 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
531GB free, PID 344b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 111 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
Read 144
Write 137
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 115
134% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 37.1
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 31.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 114%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback