Gigabyte GA-B650E AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 288%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 370%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive439% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 18:20
Run Duration403 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$486
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 216
2-Core 430
127% 245 Pts
4-Core 844
8-Core 1,635
147% 1,240 Pts
64-Core 3,737
231% 3,737 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
XFX(1EAE 7905) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver:
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
243% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 449
Parallax 648
255% 470 fps
MRender 473
Gravity 257
Splatting 449
326% 393 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 243%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$569
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 495 494 496 496 496 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 497
Mixed 455
SusWrite 495
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 63.9
224% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 137%
Great: 129%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2990 1827 1828 1842 1844 1842 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
439% Outstanding
Read 2,839
Write 3,525
Mixed 3,179
SusWrite 2,029
654% 2,893 MB/s
4K Read 78.5
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 122
406% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 1,873
DQ Write 1,522
DQ Mixed 1,686
1,265% 1,694 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 439%
Great: 508%
Adata LEGEND 960 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: A200V9QD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4739 4744 4469 4723 4743 4746 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
633% Outstanding
Read 3,651
Write 4,833
Mixed 3,072
SusWrite 4,694
920% 4,063 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 249
4K Mixed 110
382% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,971
DQ Write 1,718
DQ Mixed 1,917
1,417% 1,869 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 633%
Great: 633%
Lexar NM800PRO 2TB
728GB free
Firmware: 3.7.F.V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5265 5243 5219 5219 3898 1263 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
582% Outstanding
Read 2,603
Write 5,328
Mixed 3,141
SusWrite 4,351
878% 3,856 MB/s
4K Read 82.3
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 128
443% 167 MB/s
DQ Read 1,886
DQ Write 1,510
DQ Mixed 1,701
1,272% 1,699 MB/s
Poor: 248%
This bench: 582%
Great: 614%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 170 181 182 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 138%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
5TB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 165 176 177 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 138%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
382GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 140 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 88.6
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 141
70% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FL DDR5 6000 C32 2x16GB-$98
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 78.5
MC Write 64.2
MC Mixed 66.2
199% 69.6 GB/s
SC Read 55.8
SC Write 64
SC Mixed 56.9
168% 58.9 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 189%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7203 QBQ90
Typical GA-B650E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $2,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback