Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '24 at 01:43
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 218
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 510
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 39.1
30% 39 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 27.7
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 36 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
920GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 178
Write 38.7
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 40.3
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 141 143 138 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 140
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 90%
I-O DATA HDC-U 320GB
203GB free, PID 010f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 63.1
Write 13.7
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 26.1
36% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
35% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-8GK JM1333KLN-8GK 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78CE BenQ GL2460
Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback