Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 02:46
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$255
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 157
2-Core 308
103% 187 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 1,217
99% 865 Pts
64-Core 2,053
127% 2,053 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750
PNY(196E 13B2) ≥ 4GB; PNY XLR8 GeForce RTX 4070Ti OC 12GB GDDR6X
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 371
Reflection 359
Parallax 426
302% 385 fps
Gravity 312
Splatting 225
232% 268 fps
Poor: 208% Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1287 1281 1291 1294 1300 1290 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 1,381
Mixed 1,416
SusWrite 1,290
319% 1,418 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 61.8
200% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,468
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 1,243
898% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 255%
Great: 333%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
171GB free
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 769 81 81 85 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 1,135
Mixed 621
SusWrite 506
158% 695 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67.5
218% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,053
DQ Write 1,227
DQ Mixed 1,473
1,018% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 170%
Great: 299%
Hiksemi MD202 1TB
120GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 448 442 450 452 456 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.9% Very good
Read 372
Write 247
Mixed 287
SusWrite 450
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 26.4
87% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 57.9
50% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
101GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 83
Write 81.5
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 83.2
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 130 130 130 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 92.4
Write 110
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 128
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
207% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
31GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 213 213 212 213 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 127
Write 107
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 213
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2600 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 27.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 29.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 34" 1280 720 CMI3400 GM34-CW
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $626
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback