MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 13:55
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 170
2-Core 345
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 692
8-Core 1,075
109% 883 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 110%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 169
Parallax 171
138% 170 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
122% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 682 639 632 631 640 641 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,611
Write 826
Mixed 782
SusWrite 644
214% 966 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 48.9
170% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,195
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 432
405% 654 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 190%
Great: 237%
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
27GB free
Firmware: S0807A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 30 31 44 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 98%
SSD 256GB
64GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 62 66 75 54 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 503
Write 447
Mixed 415
SusWrite 119
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 26.7
134% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 40.2
93% 187 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 108%
Miwhole CT200 512GB
173GB free
Firmware: SN07443
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1228 1286 1281 1285 1268 1062 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
245% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 1,322
Mixed 1251
SusWrite 1,235
290% 1,286 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 66.5
220% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 1,059
798% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 245%
Great: 245%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: V56OA73A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 53 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 63.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 51.7
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S949B2UUH-ITR CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.2
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 UTO2403 Viso 24W+
Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback