Asus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 16:23
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G-$159
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.55 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 200
2-Core 345
108% 205 Pts
4-Core 657
8-Core 997
103% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 740M Graphics
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.40.02
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 30.8
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 51.5
27% 30.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFK3N.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,463
Write 2,287
Mixed 1,381
385% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.1
200% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,019
782% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 323%
WD Elements 25A2 750GB
676GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 60.1
111% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-8 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 30
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 21.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 15
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 144 27" 1280 720 AUS27AF VG278
Typical TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback