Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0508

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 14 - RZ09-0508  (all builds)
Motherboard PI4100
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 08:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 68.9
1-Core 198
2-Core 390
112% 219 Pts
4-Core 777
8-Core 1,500
135% 1,138 Pts
64-Core 1,757
109% 1,757 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Device(1A58 2022) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 86.8
43% 56.7 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 111
61% 67.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2761 2912 2908 2596 1665 1712 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,503
Write 2,988
Mixed 2,811
SusWrite 2,426
607% 2682 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 78.3
251% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 1,181
DQ Mixed 1,183
910% 1,239 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 383%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
112% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 48.7
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 45.6
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 31.5
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 112%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 14" 1280 720 TMX0003 TL140ADXP04-0
Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0508 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0508

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback