Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0508

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive408% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 14 - RZ09-0508  (all builds)
Motherboard PI4100
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 204
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 755
68% 572 Pts
64-Core 1,287
80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Device(1A58 2022) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 33
Parallax 90.9
45% 59.7 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 105
61% 69.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$289
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3504 3549 3513 3560 3582 3599 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
408% Outstanding
Read 2,409
Write 3,660
Mixed 2,957
SusWrite 3,551
714% 3,144 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 61.4
196% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 898
630% 806 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 408%
Great: 619%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 61.6
MC Mixed 49.3
156% 54.6 GB/s
SC Read 46.2
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 50
139% 48.6 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 149%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 2R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 36% 28 216 58 240 14" 1280 720 BOE0B94
Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0508 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0508

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback