Today's hottest deals

Geekom Mini IT13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive553% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGeekom Mini IT13  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '24 at 01:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 66.4
1-Core 183
2-Core 370
106% 207 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,178
118% 961 Pts
64-Core 1,833
113% 1,833 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 32.6
21% 29.9 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 22.7
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer N7000 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14428
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3775 3427 3139 3456 3514 3461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
553% Outstanding
Read 3,739
Write 4,208
Mixed 2802
SusWrite 3462
801% 3,553 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 110
366% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 2,114
DQ Write 1,421
DQ Mixed 1,455
1,170% 1,663 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 553%
Great: 553%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 36.3
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 26.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 27" 1280 720 HKC2711 27E1QA
Typical Mini IT13 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Geekom Mini IT13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback