Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 08 '24 at 20:34
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 848
91% 723 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$389
Gigabyte(1458 4106) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3285 MHz, MLim: 4738 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 49%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 378 168 257 202 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 126
Write 1,050
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 338
151% 655 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.1
212% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 811
511% 585 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 273%
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
155GB free
Firmware: 231050WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 724 238 238 240 240 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 1,597
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 320
264% 1,181 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.3
209% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 949
747% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 194%
Great: 226%
KBM 512GB 512GB
250GB free
Firmware: W0411A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 435 437 429 430 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 420
Mixed 407
SusWrite 435
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 23.5
122% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 32.6
81% 162 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
KBM 1TB 1TB
116GB free
Firmware: W0411A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 47 48 46 47 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 473
Write 384
Mixed 399
SusWrite 47.2
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 24.5
124% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 35.9
81% 160 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 100%
KBM 512GB 512GB
127GB free
Firmware: W0411A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 437 164 38 38 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 470
Write 406
Mixed 397
SusWrite 223
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 23.7
128% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 33.7
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 92%
Jmicron Generic 240GB
166GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 105 85 87 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 377
Write 371
Mixed 277
SusWrite 141
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 23.9
81% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 137
114% 164 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 26.8
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DFB SAMSUNG
Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 765 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback