Today's hottest deals

Default H110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault H110  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault H110
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateAug 13 '24 at 06:49
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 84%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 89.9
48% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 177
18% 144 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 71
Parallax 64.9
50% 65.5 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 63.5
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Frontech 128GB 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 292 320 187 50 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 295
Write 346
Mixed 261
SusWrite 195
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 16.9
57% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 90.9
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 139
106% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 74%
Geonix Gold 256GB
144GB free
Firmware: T0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 259 274 284 280 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 361
Write 277
Mixed 265
SusWrite 269
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 12.3
49% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 33
72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 18.5" 1280 720 AOC1950 1950W
Typical H110 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Default H110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback