Today's hottest deals

Samsung TC2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemSamsung TC2  (all builds)
MotherboardSamsung Saturn
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160302
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 15:23
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-222GC SOC R5E Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
Memory 39.7
1-Core 17.5
2-Core 66.6
25% 41.3 Pts
4-Core 66.9
8-Core 67.4
9% 67.2 Pts
64-Core 66.9
4% 66.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics
Device(1022 1234) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.101.1001.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 3.28
2% 3.22 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 2.17
2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon U 7-L2032 32GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HM5S Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 273
Write 82.9
Mixed 128
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 15.7
71% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 88.8
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 23.5
32% 59.5 MB/s
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Read 15
Write 7.06
Mixed 8.66
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.79
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.006
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674EB0-YK0 K4B4G1646D-BCMA 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback