Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory375 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '24 at 01:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3245
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 947
84% 710 Pts
64-Core 2,588
160% 2,588 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Apple(106B 0203) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 32GB, Driver: 21.30.44.20
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 119
Parallax 210
106% 153 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 149
Splatting 82
88% 111 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP4096 4TB
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1715 1575 1573 1758 1780 1719 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 8% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7CPR4N-WM 6x31.8GB
6 of 12 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 63.1
MC Write 83.2
MC Mixed 67.8
204% 71.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 170%
This bench: 170%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.4" 1280 720 VSC0C28 VX2453 Series
Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback