Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC11PABi5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11PAHi5
MotherboardIntel NUC11PABi5  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '24 at 13:17
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 64.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 466
52% 409 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 3004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3790
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 22.6
16% 21.3 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 15.7
15% 19 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512Q-A01 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 599 872 821 772 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,498
Write 1,146
Mixed 945
SusWrite 662
237% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 25.9
122% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 509
370% 489 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 158%
Great: 257%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4S08G32C22ST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F52 U32J59x
Typical NUC11PABi5 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PABi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback