Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 333%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 470%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics322% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive422% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D69
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)  (all builds)
Memory50.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240723
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '24 at 13:37
Run Duration425 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$493
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 217
2-Core 429
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,638
132% 1,159 Pts
64-Core 3,852
238% 3,852 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
322% Outstanding
Lighting 476
Reflection 571
Parallax 785
388% 610 fps
MRender 511
Gravity 551
Splatting 300
356% 454 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 322%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 4TB-$350
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3945 4019 3619 1193 1210 1178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 4,881
Write 3,932
Mixed 3,034
SusWrite 2,527
803% 3,594 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 53.1
172% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 538
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 577
387% 472 MB/s
Poor: 415%
This bench: 422%
Great: 994%
Wd_black SN850X HS 1000GB
3TB free
Firmware: 624361WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3097 3094 3080 3026 3066 3081 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 3,579
Write 3,383
Mixed 2,646
SusWrite 3,074
713% 3,171 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 46.5
158% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 532
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 582
412% 524 MB/s
Poor: 402%
This bench: 402%
Great: 651%
Wd_black SN850X HS 2000GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 624361WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2982 2935 2899 2987 2662 2338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 3,519
Write 2,962
Mixed 2,724
SusWrite 2,800
674% 3,001 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 50.4
173% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 574
420% 546 MB/s
Poor: 389%
This bench: 389%
Great: 665%
Corsair MP700 2TB
441GB free
Firmware: EQFM22.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2853 2844 2839 1999 1739 1192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 3,799
Write 3,163
Mixed 2284
SusWrite 2,244
643% 2,873 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 50.3
164% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 571
392% 488 MB/s
Poor: 459%
This bench: 360%
Great: 843%
WD WD8001FZBX-00ASY 8TB
790GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 227 238 236 226 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 234
Write 243
Mixed 117
SusWrite 233
151% 207 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.7
408% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 74.8
MC Write 68.3
MC Mixed 67.6
201% 70.2 GB/s
SC Read 58.1
SC Write 65.5
SC Mixed 63
178% 62.2 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 192%
Great: 297%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 4R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 10% 10 190 11 138 48.4" 3072 1705 IOC9029 48Q1V
History: Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B | Score 28: 0P 4R 1G 5B
Typical MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 404%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 531%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback